|
|
 |
[
PLEASE LOGIN TO POST TO THE FORUM
]
|
|
|
steve johnson
- sehjohnson@hotmail.com
|
Mon, 17 June 02 01:02 GMT
|
They both are, in equal measure, in their own ways. Where the "big" coach may get all the accolades in public and the media, the "small" coach, who does all the things you mention, lives in the hearts of his/her players, and all those associated with the fine job being done. And although we CAN manage without the "big" coaches (because there are enough of them who are of almost the same quality), we cannot manage without the "small" coaches, because the future of the game would be in serious doubt without the efforts of those doing the building at the grassroots.
|
-------------------------
SteveJinJapan |
|
|
therugbycoach
|
Fri, 14 June 02 22:48 GMT
|
Now heres a thought provoking subject.
Is a good coach, a coach who with a team of other good coaches, and a team of full time professional players, win a few matches, or is it the coach who taught those players to play and got them noticed all be it in a team that never won anything. or maybe even the coach that gets a team of basket cases and total no hopers into a team and play a reasonable game week in week out ???????????
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
